Sarbanes-Oxley
and supply-chain security
Journal of Commerce
Monday, November 15, 2004
By: COREY JORDAN
Two recent colossal events, the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks
and accounting scandals at major U.S. corporations, changed
the meaning of "security blanket" and how we conduct
our lives, companies and supply chains.
While
the attacks produced new acronyms such as DHS and C-TPAT,
the corporate accounting scandals led Congress to adopt
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. SOX, as the law is known, was a
direct response to the corporate debacles of Enron, Tyco
and MCI WorldCom. In each case, while the chief executive
was touting his company's financial stability to Wall Street
analysts and shareholders, company officials were busy creating
a precarious house of cards fraught with inaccuracies and
debt.
With
SOX now in place, the chief executive and the chief financial
officer will be held accountable and responsible. The law
states that both must sign off on and can be held accountable
for:
-- All
financial statements, both internal and external, such as
those published and distributed to shareholders, the Securities
and Exchange Commission and analysts. These include quarterly
and annual forecasts, 10(k) and 10(q) filings, and other
statements.
-- Accounting
practices and standard operating procedures, or SOPs.
-- Certification
from internal and external auditors validating that SOP
documentation and practices are legal and accurate.
The
company must make itself available for scrutiny by outside
auditors, the SEC and government investigators. If wrongdoing
is uncovered, company officials can trade their pinstriped
suits for a striped uniform of another kind. They will no
longer be permitted to say, "I didn't know about ...
it was his responsibility!"
This
increased scrutiny goes beyond the boardroom. For years,
while senior management strategized upstairs working with
MBAs and high-priced analysts, the "grunts" toiled
down in the warehouse, making sure products got in and out
on time. Not only did the chief executive or chief financial
officer not know this was taking place, most of the time
they couldn't even find the dock!
This
has pluses for supply-chain professionals. Anne Marie Griffin,
Microsoft's senior manager for global trade compliance,
noted at last summer's American Association of Exporters
and Importers conference that Sarbanes-Oxley has helped
with export compliance. "There's money now, there's
high visibility," she said. "Our CFO comes and
see us and gets us the resources we need, including IT systems."
For
years, Customs and Border Protection and other governmental
agencies have required companies to submit import-export
documentation that includes: Entry Summary forms - 7501
and 3461 (for imports); Automa-ted Export System - electronic
version of the shipper's export declaration (for exports);
commercial and pro-forma invoices; certificate of origin;
correct HTUS/Schedule B classifications to determine duty
rates and taxes; letters of credit and money transfers;
applicable licenses or permits; quota documentation; and
packing lists.
This
documentation and related shipping-receiving SOPs authenticate
a company's trustworthiness to conduct international business.
It's only natural that these processes be infused into the
SOX Act's requirements. With millions of dollars expended
daily in this area, you can bet it will ultimately be an
audit point and as ripe for prosecution as misleading financial
statements.
One
can easily see a dotted-line progression of the Customs-Trade
Partner-ship Against Terrorism into the SOX arena. As the
fallout continues from the 9/11 Commission Report, don't
be surprised if the new information czar position heads
all these related programs. SOX and C-TPAT will result in
a new era of self-audit and overall business compliance
and scrutiny.
Companies
have found that C-TPAT participation has helped them with
their supply-chain management. Many corporations are creating
import-export compliance departments that usually report
directly to corporate counsel or internal audit departments,
and have an important say in supply-chain, manufacturing
and risk-management decisions. These professionals have
become the de facto watchdog over the entire supply chain.
Many
companies with limited staff retain consulting firms to
manage their compliance programs. Not only does the consultant
monitor supply-chain, manufacturing and risk-management
issues, but also broker relationships.
Corporations
are discovering the importance of a safe, competitive and
secure global supply chain. Operating within the SOX guidelines
has become another skill set that must be mastered by logistics,
traffic and warehousing managers as well as chief executives
and chief financial officers. A company's survival may depend
on it.
Corey
Jordan is vice president, account management, of American
River International in Melville, N.Y. He can be reached
at (631) 396-6824, or via e-mail at corey@worldest.com.